post the video here so we can all see it casue i highly doubt @BigRed was tackling you as he doesnt do that so it was if at all prob lag
1 Like
and quit bring cvs down to ammo drain as bringin 1 sv doesnt not consisit of a base attack ,thats just another trick of yours to ammo drain , and dont let me catch you ranzeth agian trying to glitch thru the base
1 Like
Please take this to the General Discussion thread, this isn’t the place to vent your frustrations.
1 Like
This sounds like a load of crap, you fly your over sized CV BREAKING THE RULES BY GRIEFING, and then get killed in our base because you got trapt and out smarted by the defender? what you want us to just LET YOU IN?
If anyone should be punished it should be ZipSnipe because he admitted to breaking the rules.
1 Like
Not to mention i have reports of ZipSnipe flying the CV into tower and abusing the rendering by fusing his OVER SIZED CV with my Tower. This is CLEARLY Greifing.
1 Like
to me it looks like a visual glitch.
ZipSnipe why didn’t you relog?
so you admit to using a over blocks CV/SV to gain access to the base.
so you do realize this is a alpha game and it is not optimized for PVP.
so the blocks are visually glitched.
this is your own fault that you did not relog.
1 Like
Although at this stage I have not seen any video I would like to take this opportunity to defend myself from this allegation.
From my prospected I am not tackling the CV, I am trying to stay to the front flat part of the cv to avoid the guns firing from the top and with all the base guns firing to my rear I get hooked up in the suspended blocks that was once the front of the craft.
Also from my prospective I am the one being pushed/tackled by the large cv “I am moving from side to side but get hooked up in the suspended blocks from the damaged cv”
I would expect any video to show this and to include the intent of the cv to fly over the base cluster and in to my path rather than trying to go round my position.
If your intention was to put the cv over or on the base cluster is this not braking a number of rules by intent to ammo drain/ block ect.
Can you please clarify the class size and block count of the for mentioned cv as it seemed a little over class1 and 150 blocks?” just to clear this one up to avoid speculation and for the record”
Thanks
1 Like
says the guy that reported somebody for using a single “naughty” word.
Using an over block CV within the time limit provided is not against the rules. TPP did it to us all the time in 7.0 when you guys would attack us. Were you not there for those fights?
I am asking because it happened a lot, so I dont see why we can’t do it now.
1 Like
Although at this stage I have not seen any video I would like to take this opportunity to defend myself from this allegation.
From my prospected I am not tackling the CV, I am trying to stay to the front flat part of the cv to avoid the guns firing from the top and with all the base guns firing to my rear I get hooked up in the suspended blocks that was once the front of the craft.
Also from my prospective I am the one being pushed/tackled by the large cv “I am moving from side to side but get hooked up in the suspended blocks from the damaged cv”
I would expect any video to show this and to include the intent of the cv to fly over the base cluster and in to my path rather than trying to go round my position.
If your intention was to put the cv over or on the base cluster is this not braking a number of rules by intent to ammo drain/ block ect.
Can you please clarify the class size and block count of the for mentioned cv as it seemed a little over class1 and 150 blocks?” just to clear this one up to avoid speculation and for the record”
Thanks
2 Likes
Using an oversized CV is not so much the concern, it’s what the cv is being used for. Its one thing to use it as part of an attack ie to draw fire from base/hv guns and to provide cover to the attacker’s sv’s/hv’s.
Where the line is crossed is when the intent is to drain ammo or lay the cv over the base guns in effect blocking the guns.
And back in 7.0 all sides can admit to the over use of cv’s “cv sponge” being used to attack bases but that was back in 7.0 and it has been made clear that the use of oversized vessel’s to gain the upper hand is an exploit therefore this is something we don’t do as that should stay back in 7.0
1 Like
It was never deemed an exploit, or if it did I have forgotten when. Rex had made several comments that using an oversized cap ship is fair game as its resources for resources.
2 Likes
Please provide evidence. I very clearly remember reading him saying it’s ok and I’ve only been on HWS since 8.0. I am looking for that post right now to put an end to this.
Limit abuse: If you place structures with the intent that HWS will capture it to attack enemies, you will be punished.
A penalty which involves Credits and RP (per the buyback formula) will apply to you if it was set to private and will apply to all faction members if it was set to faction.
This is what it states in the rules, it says nothing about using the CV as a bullet sponge, and for the record the CV soaking damage isn’t rendering your turrets useless. They’re doing exactly what they’re supposed to do: “shoot the enemy”. The last attack I was there for the CV sponge wasn’t even protecting the SV pilots as they were still getting shot at by turrets, so what you’re saying isn’t even correct. Does it help mitigate damage? Yes, does it stop damage from SV/HV pilots? No.
1 Like
I agree it was said cv’s used in an attack is fair game as its resources for resources. ”not so sure about the oversized bit though”
Maybe this needs clarifying?
1 Like
Hi Kittiez,
Nice to meet you.
It’s not the use of a cv that’s the point it’s the use of an oversized cv that needs clarification.
From what I understand the countdown timer was to give a respectable amount of time to leave the play field when dropping off hv’s ect, this became obsolete with the allowance of “now 150” block cv’s to the planet surface.
I’m not against the use of a sponge, quite to opposite “there a clever tool in the assault on a well organised base”
Perhaps a simply clarification on what size is acceptable would stop this whole cv sponge talk dragging on.
1 Like
Relog ? In the middle of an enemy base? Are you kidding me?
Yes I used an oversized cv as this is the only way to attack a 10 base cluster fuck of bases. I gained entry, shot two doors out went around a corner shot another door out and there was a block there. Heard footsteps turned around and backed up into the block which I then became stuck inside. They had a door on each side of that particular block. they were able to pass through it , I couldn’t. In the video you can clearly see him using his repair tool to fix the block as he shoots through.
1 Like
Just another one of there exploits. The blocks where added from a secondary base then removed
1 Like
Just another reminder, those were combat steel blocks not armored concrete. Our bases are made from armored concrete. It doesn’t make sense to use a block with less hitpoints in pvp. Also all of our bases are at angles to each other. Those blocks are straight on like your CV was while render clipping our base which is an exploit in itself.
Reaper should get in and respond on his behalf too but that is up to him. I talked to him and he said he noticed the Combat steel the first time and attributed it to a glitch so he logged out and logged back in. When he logged back in the blocks were gone and that’s when he started shooting you.
I saw you keep spawning back in the game a few times so I put up more doors to trap you in that corridor. There were a few others that were watching too.
2 Likes
So he was glitched inside the CV that makes more sense if true.
1 Like
This managed to devolve itself rather quickly.
1 Like